![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=92.2){kind=small}
Gaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh. Honestly? how can one base a "faith" on such bloody hypocracy and blatant lack of logic. I'm sick fed up of this "respect my faith and let me talk about it nonstop but don't dare let me know about yours, your christian?... stop persecuting me!!" *Stomp*.
And what the hell is with this "whatever is right for you" shit. by definition only one thing can be the truth thus this "I belive this thus for me it is right" crap is so erronious it's unbeliveable. Gah. At least we have the logical integrity to belive that if we belivesomething we belive it applies to EVERYONE.
It's nothing but reactionism any way
November 15 2005, 00:39:59 UTC 6 years ago
The winners are always the ones who write the history books.
November 15 2005, 09:56:07 UTC 6 years ago
I'm not saying i'm nessessarly right, i'm just saying that what is that state of things is the state of things, and yes there are different ways of perciving that but two contrery ideas cannot by definition both be true. Truth is not, by deffinition of the word, subjective.
I will agree that what we already think and belive colours our judgement with regard to how we react to information, be it truth, evidence of truth, whatever but the bottom line is that existance has a state, what is existance's state is existance's state, no ammout of humans kidding themselves is going to change that.
Having said that I did write this entry while rather het up